So naturally, we ended up with the historic value room. Before I complain, though, I’ll tell you its good points:
It was very clean.
It was updated.
It had a flat screen TV.
It was in a great location.
Now let me tell the downside:
It was small.
Yes, we were expecting small but we weren’t expecting smaller than Leo’s nursery, possibly smaller than my mid-sized SUV.
It had no view.
Now when I say, “it had no view” I don’t mean I’m some sort of diva who expects to see a skyline or a body of water. I would settle for an alley. No, when I say “it had no view,” I mean it had no window that we could see out of.
One window was an interior window that looked out into the hotel hallway. The other one was a tiny way-up-high window that was just there for fire codes. See?
But since I rank my priorities as clean, good location, view, I was really okay with the good old historic value room. I think it's my duty, though, to invite you to add that term to your list of hotel room euphemisms so you have it in your mind next time you're booking a trip. Now you can include "historic value" with other well-known hotel room euphemisms like “charming,” “quaint” and “basic.”
Oh, and always beware if they’re hyping up minimal amenities like “hot water!” “A/C!” "shampoo!" "hairdryer!" and “free Bible in every room!”
Come to think of it, our room didn’t come with a Bible. If only we had booked a "religious value room..."
4 comments:
My favorite comment for a "boutique" hotel I stayed in once in NYC was, "If you are obese you probably won't be able to fit in the bathroom."
They were correct, and I could only afford it b/c I got a deal on Priceline!
Ours should have said, "If you are claustrophobic, you will not like this room."
That's smaller than our NYC hotel room!
I told Frank we should just pretend like we were staying in a guest room at someone's house. We would be pretty impressed if that were the case. Of course, it would also be free!
Post a Comment